Solicitamos su permiso para la utilización de cookies en cumplimiento del Real Decreto-ley 13/2012. Si continúa navegando consideramos que acepta su uso. OK | Más información
A A A
ISSN 1134-0991 / ISSN-e 2340-2539 / Año de comienzo 1993
Área de conocimiento: Trabajo Social y Servicios Sociales
Inicio >> TSH 104 >> DE LA TEORÍA A LA PRÁCTICA: ANALIZANDO EL POTENCIAL DE TRANSFERIBILIDAD DE ...

DE LA TEORÍA A LA PRÁCTICA: ANALIZANDO EL POTENCIAL DE TRANSFERIBILIDAD DE PROYECTOS DE INNOVACIÓN SOCIAL EN SERVICIOS SOCIALES

[FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: ANALYZING THE TRANSFERABILITY POTENTIAL OF SOCIAL INNOVATION PROJECTS IN SOCIAL SERVICES]
Autoría: Anillo Pérez, Luna del Alba; Ferri Fuentevilla, Elena; Martí García, Susana.
Datos profesionales del autor/a: Universidad de Huelva. Facultad de Trabajo Social.
Correspondencia: Luna del Alba Anillo Pérez. Email: Lunadelalba.anillo@alu.uhu.es.
Resumen
Para mejorar el impacto y adaptabilidad de los proyectos de innovación social, es esencial compartir y transferir de manera efectiva estas innovaciones. Este estudio analiza la capacidad de transferencia de los proyectos de innovación social de la convocatoria L3 de la Junta de Andalucía. Para ello, se identificaron y analizaron los proyectos, se realizaron entrevistas a una muestra representativa de entidades y se llevó a cabo el análisis cualitativo de la información obtenida. En los resultados se identificaron factores que facilitan o dificultan este proceso, así como recomendaciones de mejora. Aunque se incide en el desarrollo de innovaciones sociales en los servicios sociales, la rigidez estructural y la inestabilidad financiera limitan su aplicación y sostenibilidad a largo plazo.
Descarga del artículo:
Palabras Clave
Innovación, entrevistas, transferencia, evaluación, servicios sociales.
Abstract
To improve the impact and adaptability of social innovation projects, it is essential to effectively share and transfer these innovations. This study analyzes the transferability of social innovation projects from the Andalusian Regional Government"s L3 call for proposals. To this end, projects were identified and analyzed, interviews were conducted with a representative sample of organizations, and a qualitative analysis of the information obtained was conducted. The results identified factors that facilitate or hinder this process, as well as recommendations for improvement. Although the development of social innovations in social services is emphasized, structural rigidity and financial instability limit their implementation and long-term sustainability.
Key Words
Innovation, interviews, transfer, evaluation, social services
Referencia Normalizada (cómo citar este artículo)
Anillo Pérez, L. del A., Ferri Fuentevilla, E., y Martí García, S. (2025). «De la Teoría a la Practica: Analizando el Potencial de Transferibilidad de Proyectos de Innovación Social en Servicios Sociales». Trabajo Social Hoy 104(1), 1-23. Doi:10.12960/TSH.2025.0014
Texto del Artículo
 
Referencias
Anderson, A. R. y Hardwick, J. (2017). «Collaborating for innovation: the socialised management of knowledge». International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 1181-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0447-6

Banerjee, S., Shajahan, P. K., Ghunnar, P. y Shaikh, M. (2024). «Participatory Methodologies as People-Centered Social Innovation: Listening to Voices of People in Policy Practice». Societies, 14(12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120256

Baru, A., Treat, A., Lonnberg, D., Hoermann, E., Taher, F., Moges, M. y Yang, Z. (2020). Strategy to scale social innovation for development: A hands-on report for UNDP Accelerator Labs to enable context-specific scaling of social innovation to achieve the SDGs. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/acceleratorlabs/Sca lingStrategy_UNDPAccLabs_SIPAL.pdf

Belcher, B. M., Claus, R., Davel, R. y Jones, S. M. (2022). «Evaluating and improving the contributions of university research to social innovation». Social Enterprise Journal, 18(1), 51-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2020-0099

Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2006) «Using thematic analysis in psychology». Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burchett, H. E. D., Mayhew, S. H., Lavis, J. N. y Dobrow, M. J. (2013). «When can research from one setting be useful in another? Understanding perceptions of the applicability and transferability of research». Health promotion international, 28(3), 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/das026

Cunha, J. y Benneworth, P. (2020). «How to measure the impact of social innovation initiatives?». International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(1), 59-

75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00240-4

Drisko, J. W. (2025). «Transferability and generalization in qualitative research». Research on Social Work Practice, 35(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241256560

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage publications. https://elearning.shisu.edu.cn/pluginfile.php/35310/mod_resource/content/2/Res earch-Intro-Flick.pdf

Flynn, M. L. (2017). «Science, Innovation, and Social Work: Clash or Convergence?». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516686198

Guzmán, C., Santos, F. J. y Savall, T. (2024). «How to explain social innovation in elderly care services: The role of for-profit and non-profit social enterprises». International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20, 1849-1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00942-6

Junta de Andalucía (29 de mayo de 2025). Subvenciones para la investigación e innovación en Servicios Sociales/Línea 3/Bases Reguladoras 2021. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/servicios/sede/tramites/procedimientos/detalle/ 24567.html

Käyhkö, J., Hildén, M., Hyttinen, I. y Korhonen-Kurki, K. (2025). «The emerging institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in sustainability research». Ambio, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02161-5

Lam, D. P. M., Martín-López, B., Wiek, A., Bennett, E. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Horcea- Milcu, A. I. y Lang, D. J. (2020). «Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: A typology of amplification processes». Urban Transformations, 2, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9

Lundmark, C., Nilsson, J. y Krook-Riekkola, A. (2023). «Taking Stock of Knowledge Transfer Studies: Finding Ways Forward». Environmental Management, 72(6), 1146-1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01877-y

Majuri, M. (2022). «Inter-firm knowledge transfer in R&D project networks: A multiple case study». Technovation, 115, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102475

McGowan, K. A. y Westley, F. (2017). «Constructing the evolution of social innovation: Methodological insights from a multi-case study». European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.7

Medianeira Bolzan, L., Cristina Bitencourt, C. y Volkmer Martins, B. (2019). «Exploring the scalability process of social innovation». Innovation & Management Review, 16(3), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0029

Mena Martínez, L. (2018). «La muestra cualitativa en la práctica: Una propuesta». Revista EIXO, 8(3), 4-15. https://scispace.com/pdf/la-muestra-cualitativa-en-la-practica- una-propuesta-1fsugecby0.pdf

Mihci, H. (2019). «Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible?». Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 337–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1705149

Montañés Serrano, M. (2013). Diseño científico de muestras estructurales. Universidad de Valladolid. https://almena.uva.es/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=34BUC_UVA:VU1&docid=alm a991008076281305774&context=L

Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. y Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. The Young Foundation & NESTA. https://youngfoundation.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf

Nandan, M., Singh, A. y Mandayam, G. (2019). «Social Value Creation and Social Innovation by Human Service Professionals: Evidence from Missouri, USA». Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040086

Närhi, K. (2002). «Transferable and negotiated knowledge: Constructing social work expertise for the future». Journal of Social Work, 2(3), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730200200304

Ødegård, A., Waldahl, R. H., Willumsen, E., Iakovleva, T. y Strype, J. (2021). «The conceptual and methodological development of the Social Innovation Measurement Model Questionnaire (SIMM-Q)». Academic Quarter| Akademisk kvarter, 23, 156-171. https://doi.org/10.5278/academicquarter.vi23.7035

Okpych, N. J. (2017). «A Historical Perspective on the Future of Innovation in Social Work». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516658355

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage publications. https://aulasvirtuales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/qualitative- research-evaluation-methods-by-michael-patton.pdf

Rice, E., Petering, R., Stringfellow, E. y Craddock, J. B. (2017). «Innovations in Community-Based and Interdisciplinary Research: A Network Perspective on Innovation in Social Work Science». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516685620

Ritchie, J. y Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications. https://mthoyibi.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/qualitative- research-practice_a-guide-for-social-science-students-and-researchers_jane- ritchie-and-jane-lewis-eds_20031.pdf

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Abdul Rasak, M. S., Alhabsyi, F. y Syam, H. (2022).« Semi- structured Interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies». IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22-29. DOI: 10.9790/7388- 1201052229

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press. https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=563ce2da6225ff3cae8 b4590&assetKey=AS%3A292843798188032%401446830810198

Sensoy Bahar, O. (2017). «A Promising Partnership: Uncovering the Middle Ground Between Social Innovation and Social Work: Response to Dr. Marilyn L. Flynn’s Remarks». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 131-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516658769

Šimelyte, A., Tvaronaviciene, M., Holmen, R. B., Burinskas, A. y Razminiene, K. (2021). «Knowledge and technology transfer as driving force for social innovations». Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 512-536. 10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.31

Song, Y., Lan, J., Zheng, G. y Wang, Y. (2023). «Innovation of Social Workers Under Different Leadership Styles: An Experimental Vignette Study». Social Work Practice, 33(7), 754-767. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221131319

Spitzer, H. y Twikirize, J. (2023). «Social innovations in rural communities in Africa’s Great Lakes region. A social work perspective». Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.013

Stavreva-Kostadinova, P. (2018). «Training of social management specialists for participation in social innovation teams». TEM Journal, 7(2), 348-354. https://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM72-16

Stringfellow, E. J. (2017). «Applying Structural Systems Thinking to Frame Perspectives on Social Work Innovation». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516660850

Szemzo, H., Mosquera, J., Polyák, L. y Hayes, L. (2022). «Flexibility and adaptation: Creating a strategy for resilience». Sustainability, 14(5), 1.19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052688

Traube, D. E., Begun, S., Okpych, N. y Choy-Brown, M. (2017). «Catalyzing Innovation in Social Work Practice». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 134-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516659140

Traube, D. E., Begun, S., Petering, R. y and Flynn, M. L. (2017). «Beta Testing in Social Work». Social Work Practice, 27(2), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516659142

Westley, F., Antadze, N., Riddell, D. J., Robinson, K. y Geobey, S. (2014). «Five configurations for scaling up social innovation: Case examples of nonprofit organizations from Canada». The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(3), 234-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314532945

Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Bauler, T. y Avelino, F. (2017). Editorial Synthesis: «Methodological Challenges in Social Innovation Research». European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.1

Datos de la Revista
TSH 104
31 - DICIEMBRE - 2025
Buscar artículos
Texto
Campo de búsqueda
Revista asociada en
cross reff